ENVE

On the positive side these are supple, well-made tires that mounted just exactly perfectly to ENVE SES 4.5 wheels. Running tpu tubes and not tubeless the tires were only 47mm wide! They should measure at least 49 new with 25mm inner rims and then gradually relax to 50 over time. The ride was not as supple as the 48's I was running from another brand whose tires DO measure 50mm wide when run with 25mm inner rims.

I took these off and sold them barely used after one ride and am not pleased with the tires being significantly under sized. I really like the black sidewalls that I can't get with my previous tires, but looks aren't much compared to performance.

Hopefully, future runs of the tires will be different.

I have Campagnolo Bora Ultra carbon wheels on a couple of my bikes. On a hot day the valve of the front wheel pushed through to the inside of the wheel causing an instant flat. That valve had a conical kind of triangular shape which enabled the failure. The ENVE valves are, by comparison, have a long and rectangular base which fit the rim valley perfectly and, once installed, allowed me to pump up the tires with my old Silca pump as quickly as pumping up a tubed tire. This is especially important as on the road puncture management with tubeless tires can be especially difficult.

On my Tarmac SL8 that's running SRAM AXS I am rocking the Zipp SL 80 Race bars at 36cm, which make sense keeping it all in house and having the ability to easily run BLIP shifters. I like the recessed routing on the SL 80 Race because the Tarmac stem I am running does not support in route routing, however on my Supersix Evo Hi-Mod running Shiamno Di2 with the Conceal stem I am running the ENVE SES Aero In Route bars 35/40 since they can be run semi integrated or fully internal. Both bars weigh about the same 250g, both have flared bottoms and narrow tops, but I found the ENVE Aero bars to have much more of a flat razer like shape than the Zipp's. Both bars are comfortable on the tops and hoods and both have similar reaches 79mm vs 80mm. The biggest differences would be the ENVE bar is super stiff, while I found the Zipp to offer much more compliance. The integration on the ENVE even when run semi integrated and not through the stem is much cleaner than the Zipp's that rely on a really tidy tape job. I am not really a fan of the integrated bar end plugs, but I guess they are more aero, but yet again you are stuck with this type of plus unless you cut the bar ends. I guess the killer feature for some people will be the fact that you can add ENVE's Aero clip on extensions to these bars, making them perfect for time trials or triathlons. Pair the ENVE Aero pairs with ENVE's own Aero In Route stems and you have the cleanest two piece aero setup out there, granted my Supersix Evo does not support them stem. Price wise typical ENVE top of the market pricing and in contrast the Zipp SL 80 Race is anywhere from $25-$60 cheaper before you factor in an sales or coupons. Both bars are great but in my opinion I still run the Zipp's if you were running SRAM AXS with a non in route stem and I run the ENVE if you were running Shimano and or running an ENVE In Route Stem. BTW the aero benefits of running a very narrow two piece handlebar integrated or semi integrated at the tops is much more aero than running a larger one piece cockpit integrated, plus it allows you to be adjust fit so much easier, it's cheaper in initial purchase and replacement cost.

I use these and the Arundel mandible and in terms of value for money somehow Enve comes out the winner? They are light, hold the bottles in a death grip and look good in matte. No complaints.